| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SF 29: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS ETHICS ACT - 1997 General Session Sponsor: Joint Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Interim Committee SF 29 was an attempt to respond to public concern about ethics in state government. Its death, along with that of HB 284, Public Employees and Officials Ethics Act - 3, which was killed in the House Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee without a vote, helped spark the drive for the Wyoming Ethics Initiative. (HB 284 was sponsored by Rep. Cale Case, R-H54, Lander, and co-sponsored by Reps. Bill Bensel (D-H30, Sheridan), Wayne Johnson (R-H9, Cheyenne), Mike Massie (D-H13, Laramie), Pat Nagel (R-H56, Casper), Phil Nicholas (R-H14, Laramie), and Rick Tempest (R-H37, Casper).) SF 29 prohibited public officials, members, or employees from:
Under the definitions of SF 29, "public official" included any elected or appointed official of the state, a county, a municipality, or a political subdivision. "Family member" included spouse, parent, sibling, child, in-laws, and grandchildren. SF 29 established a Public Ethics Review Committee for investigation of ethics complaints against state officials, members, or employees, and also designated the proper venues for complaints at lower levels of government. The Public Ethics Review Committee would consist of five members appointed as follows: One public employee, member, or official appointed by the Chief Justice of the Wyoming Supreme Court; one public employee, member, or official of a political subdivision of the state, appointed by the Governor; and three members who are not public employees, members, or officials, appointed by the Governor, Speaker of the House, and President of the Senate (one each). The Public Ethics Review Committee was also empowered to conduct training sessions and workshops on ethics, and to answer inquiries about ethics and interpretation of the ethics law. Finally, SF 29 provided penalties for violation of the law, including imprisonment, fines, and recovery of anything of value, in addition to any other remedies provided by existing statutes. SF 29 was referred to the Senate Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Committee, where it was approved on a 3-2 vote. Because it carried an appropriation, it was re-referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee, where it passed 5-0. It then died on General File in the Senate (was not brought up for debate). The votes listed below are the Senate Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Committee vote and the Senate Appropriations Committee vote. A YES vote means the senator favored an ethics bill for public officials, members and employees. A NO vote means the senator opposed an ethics bill.
www.equalitystate.org Copyright 1999, Equality State Policy Center | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||