| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HB 10: CHILD SAFETY RESTRAINTS - AMENDMENTS - 1998 Budget/Special Session Sponsor: Rep. Larry Meuli (R-H8, Cheyenne); co-sponsors Rep. Fred Parady (R-H17, Rock Springs), Sen. Donald Lawler (R-S5, Cheyenne) The amendments to Wyoming’s child restraint law contained in HB 10 closed the loopholes in the existing law and raised the fine for non-compliance from $25 to $50 for the first offense. HB 10 required that children four and under (weighing 40 pounds or less) must be secured in a child safety restraint system. The bill also deleted the exemptions for motor homes, vans, and pickups, requiring simply that children be restrained in any vehicle that was equipped with safety belts at the time of manufacture. HB 10 also deleted the exemptions for lack of space for a child restraint system or lack of sufficient safety belts, and the provision allowing persons other than the child’s parent or guardian to ignore the restraint requirement. The latter provision was modified by a Senate amendment exempting drivers "rendering aid or assistance to the child or his parent or guardian." Proponents of the bill argued that the numerous exemptions in the existing child restraint law made it ineffective, and that if we really want to protect children from auto accident injuries and death, we should get serious about requiring child restraints. Opponents argued that child restraints should be a matter of personal choice, and that repealing the exemptions would place a hardship on families with certain types of vehicles or who must rely on others to transport their children. HB 10 passed the House, 45-15, and the Senate, 17-13. The House vote to concur with the Senate amendment showed less support, 39-20, indicating that some representatives disliked the wording of the Senate amendment, thinking it could open another loophole. The votes listed below are the third reading (final passage) votes in the House and Senate. (The Senate vote is on the bill as amended above.) A YES vote means the legislator favored strengthening the existing child restraint law. A NO vote means the legislator opposed strengthening the existing child restraint law.
www.equalitystate.org Copyright 1999, Equality State Policy Center | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||