ESPC Home | 2003-04 LAP* Book | Background | Legislator Profiles | Key Votes | LAP* Book Home


Numeric List

Budget

Accountability

Health &
Human Services

Justice System

Education

State Employees

Taxation &
Revenue

Wildlife &
Environment

Worker &
Public Safety

Tribal Affairs

Senior Citizens

SF 62: Medical Malpractice Insurance
2004 Budget Session
Sponsor: Sen. Charlie Scott (R-S30, Casper); co-sponsors Sen. John Barrasso (R-S27, Casper) and Rep. Tony Ross (R-H7, Cheyenne)
Tort Reform - Background
HJ 2/SJ 5: Healthcare Providers - Constitutional Amendment
HJ 11: Medical Review Panel - Constitutional Amendment
HB 78: Certificate of Review
HB 102: Medical Malpractice Panel
HB 131: Medical Malpractice Claims Reporting
HB 173: Medical Malpractice Insurance Premium Pool
HB 193: Tort Reform - 2
HB 204: Excess Medical Noneconomic Damages
HB 206: Health Care Malpractice Insurance Regulation
SJ 2: Medical Errors Commission-Constitutional Amendment
SF 28: Medical Errors Commission - Implementation Study
SF 29: Health Care Information Technology Study
SF 34: Hospital Catastrophic Care
SF 42: Obstetric Subsidy
SF 45: Health Care Provider Loan Repayments
SF 62: Medical Malpractice Insurance
SF 86: Insurance and Tort Reform Study

         SF 62 proposed some additional regulations that would apply to non-competitive insurance markets and to medical malpractice insurance.
         When insurance rates are regulated as non-competitive markets, SF 62 would require a public hearing when an insurance company requested a rate increase greater than 30% above the previously approved rate. For non-competitive insurance markets and for professional liability insurance, SF 62 also would limit the amount by which an individual insured person's rate could vary, and would limit the amount an insurance company could charge for extended reporting coverage.
         SF 62 would require advance notice of policy cancellation or premium increase for professional malpractice liability insurance of at least 90 days.
         Wyoming statutes state that the Insurance Commissioner may regulate insurance rates if the unregulated market is a non-competitive market, and if regulation will reduce rates without substantially curtailing the availability of insurance in that market.
         Supporters of SF 62 believed that the additional regulation it brought to medical malpractice insurance rates might help address the problems that Wyoming doctors have experienced as a result of large increases in malpractice insurance rates in recent year.
         Opposition to SF 62 was minimal, and the bill passed the Senate 28-1 (1 conflict-of-interest). Senator Cale Case (R-S25, Lander) cast the lone "No" vote.
         The bill was unanimously passed by the House Labor, Health and Social Services Committee and placed on the House general file, but it was not scheduled for action by the House Committee of the Whole by the deadline for legislative action, so it died on general file.