LAPBOOK
ESPC Home | 2001 LAP* Book | Background | Legislator Profiles | Key Votes | LAP* Book Home

BACK

Numeric List

Budget

Accountability

Health &
Human Services

Justice System

Education

State Employees

Taxation &
Revenue

Wildlife &
Environment

Worker &
Public Safety

INDEX LAST UPDATED
Bill Explanation 3/1/01
Legislator Votes 1/19/01
Bill as Introduced
OUTCOME
Senate Majority Leader April Brimmer Kunz killed SF 100 by not letting the bill come to a First Reading vote on the floor of the Senate, even though SF 100 was voted out of the Senate Corporations Committee on a 5-0 vote.
SF 100: Campaign reporting-receipts and expenditure filings
2001 General Session
Sponsor: Senators Case & Decaria and Representatives Burns, Johnson, L. & Warren

      Wyoming already requires complete disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures. Unfortunately, all the disclosure takes place 10 days after an election. Wyoming voters have the right to know who is financing a candidate or ballot measure prior to casting their votes.
      SF 100 would have amended Wyoming's campaign finance reporting law to require candidates to file a fully itemized statement of receipts and expenditures at least 7 days before any primary, general or special election, with the information included current to the 14th day before the election.
      Wyoming remains the ONLY state in the country that does not require reporting of campaign contributions and spending BEFORE an election.
HB 242 / HB 261 / HB 298 / SF 100 / SJ 5
ALL "GOOD GOVERNMENT" LEGISLATION IS DEAD FOR THE 2001 GENERAL SESSION

      At the beginning of the 2001 session, the Wyoming Legislature took a major step toward greater accountability to the people it represents by providing internet "streaming" (broadcast) of its session debates on the floors of the House and Senate.
      Unfortunately, that was also its last step. Halfway through the 2001 General Session, ALL accountability bills were dead.
      Five "good government" bills, sponsored by legislators from around the state and from both major parties, are dead for the 2001 General Session, three without even a hearing:
      * HB 242, provided that lobbyists will report all their spending, sponsored by Rep. Lorna Johnson, D-Laramie, and Sen. Cale Case, R-Lander (died in the House Corporations Committee without even a hearing).
      * HB 261, provided guidance to legislators on not voting on bills with which they have a conflict of interest, sponsored by Rep. Colin Simpson, R-Cody (the sponsor withdrew the bill and Speaker Tempest made no committee assignment).
      * HB 298, expanded personal financial disclosure to help determine conflicts of interest, sponsored by Rep. Chris Boswell, D-Green River (died in the House Corporations Committee without a hearing).
      * SF 100, provided for reporting campaign contributions and spending before elections, sponsored by Senators Cale Case, R-Lander, Ken Decaria, D-Evanston, and Representatives Bruce Burns, R-Sheridan, Lorna Johnson, D-Laramie, and Jane Warren, D-Laramie (Senate Majority Leader April Brimmer Kunz killed SF 100 by not letting the bill come to a First Reading vote on the floor of the Senate, even though the SF 100 was voted out of the Senate Corporations Committee on a 5-0 vote). Wyoming remains the ONLY state in the country that does not require reporting of campaign contributions and spending BEFORE an election.
      * SJ 5, would have referred to voters a ballot measure to remove a difficult and likely unconstitutional requirement for collecting signatures on initiative and referendum petitions, sponsored by Sen. Jayne Mockler, D-Cheyenne (defeated on the Senate floor by a vote of 11-19 on First Reading).
      It's particularly disappointing to see most of these bills die without debate or votes. But it's easy to understand why. Legislators who oppose accountability legislation don't want to explain recorded "no" votes to their constituents. It's a lot easier to kill a bill by referring it to a committee where the chair won't let it be heard.
      Energy industry lobbyists were partly responsible for the demise of the bills. The energy industries have historically spent heavily on campaigns and on lobbying and they don't want the public to see how much they spend trying to influence our lawmakers in Cheyenne. Under our current sorry excuse for a lobbyist reporting law, most lobbyists report nothing. Energy industry campaign contributions are publicly reported - but only after an election. Industry probably isn't interested in having voters see their contributions before they vote, especially now when the industries' contributions have increased so significantly.
      About $350,000 was contributed to the 60 representatives and 15 senators who won their races in 2000 (only half the Senate is up for re-election at a time). More than half of this total came from political action committees (PACs), and the heavyweights among the PACs were the energy, chemical and railroad industries. Collectively, these industries contributed over $82,000 to sitting legislators - 42% of the PAC total, far ahead of any other category of contributor. This represents a significant increase over the $51,650 contributed by these industries to winning candidates last election in 1998.
      Given that the energy and allied industries drive Wyoming's economy, this spending is not surprising, nor is it inappropriate. Every interest has the right to participate in elections and public policymaking. However, the public has the right to know what special interests are spending and on which candidates and elected officials."
      Unfortunately, with the demise of SF 100 and HB 242, we won't have this knowledge any time soon.
      Last week, the Equality State Policy Center's (ESPC) released its latest publication, Government That Works for You, a "blueprint" for helping make state government more accessible and accountable to the people it represents. This publication describes "good government" issues in Wyoming and proposes solutions in five areas: voter registration, lobbyist reporting, financial disclosure and conflicts of interest, campaign finance reform, and initiative and referendum processes. Visit ESPC's latest publication,
Government That Works For You.

1/19 Senate Corporations, Elections, and Political Subdivisions Committee
Ayes 5 -- Nays 0 -- Excused 0 -- Absent 0 -- Conflicts 0

Senate Corporations, Elections
and Political Subdivisions C.

Vote

Tom Kinnison

R-Sheridan(Chairman)

Yes

Cale Case

R-Lander

Yes

Keith Goodenough

D-Casper

Yes

John Hanes

R-Cheyenne

Yes

Mark Harris

D-Green River

Yes

Ayes 5 -- Nays 0 --Excused 0--Absent 0--Conflicts 0